"Il pregiudizio alla fine è una convinzione": Analisi Critica del Discorso, Philosophy for Children e Hate Speech
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60923/issn.1970-2221/23332Parole chiave:
Analisi Critica del Discorso, Philosophy for Children, hate speech, dialogo filosofico, decostruzione del pregiudizioAbstract
Il contributo affronterà le questioni epistemologiche alla base di un possibile dialogo tra la Analisi Critica del Discorso (ACD) e il programma educativo della Philosophy for Children (P4C). In particolare ci si concentrerà sulla possibilità di analizzare il dialogo filosofico – inteso come un tipo peculiare di discorso interazionale – attraverso gli strumenti di analisi ispirati alla ACD secondo la prospettiva del triangolo ideologico proposto da Teun van Dijk (2015). I dialoghi esaminati hanno avuto luogo all’interno di alcune sessioni di P4C con gli alunni di una scuola di Napoli (Italia), organizzate tra marzo e maggio 2022, durante un progetto di ricerca di dottorato finalizzato al contrasto e alla prevenzione dello hate speech tra gli adolescenti. L’analisi è stata condotta tenendo conto sia del costrutto epistemico relativo allo sviluppo del pensiero complesso (Lipman, 2000, 2003; Sharp, 1995, 2004, 2005) sia di quello relativo alla ACD ispirata al filone che si occupa di ideologia (van Dijk, 2006, 2008, 2012, 2015).
Riferimenti bibliografici
Allport, G. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, ING.
Althusser, L. (2014). Ideologia e apparati ideologici di Stato. (M. Gallerani, Trans.). Autoproduzioni. www.antiper.org/autoproduzioni. (Original work published 1970).
Austin, J.L. (2019). Come fare cose con le parole. (C. Villata, Trans.). Marietti. (Original work published 1962).
Brown, R. (2007). Psicologia sociale del pregiudizio. (G. Stella, Trans.). Fabbri Editori. (Original work published 1995).
Castleberry, J.B., & Clark, K.M. (2020). Expanding the facilitator’s toolbox: Vygotskian mediation in Philosophy for Children. Analytic Teaching and Philosophical Praxis, 40(2), 44-58.
Chetty, D. (2018). Racism as ‘Reasonableness’: Philosophy for Children and the Gated Community of Inquiry. Ethics and Education, 13(1), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2018.1430933
Cosentino, A. (2016). Dialogo e pratica filosofica di comunità. Logoi.ph – Journal of Philosophy, II(6), 105-111.
Cosentino, A. (2017). Il dialogo filosofico come strumento di ricerca. Nóema, 8(1), pp. 9-19.
De Marzio, D. (2011). What happens in philosophical texts: Matthew Lipman’s theory and practice of the philo-sophical text as model. Childhood & Philosophy, 7(13), 29-47.
Dewey, J. (1938). Logic. The theory of inquiry. Henry Holt and Company.
Dewey, J. (2009). Come pensiamo. (A. Guccione Monroy, Trans.). La Nuova Italia. (Original work published 1910).
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman Inc.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.
Franzini Tibaldeo, R. (2015). Un felice connubio di razionalità e libertà: La pratica “riflessiva” della “Philosophy for Children” (P4C) di Matthew Lipman. Itinera, 10, 362-376.
Franzini Tibaldeo, R. (2023). Matthew Lipman and Ann Margaret Sharp: Philosophy for Children’s Educational Revolution. Springer.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis. An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Northeastern University Press.
Gregory, M.R. (2022). Charles Peirce and the Community of Philosophical Inquiry. Analytic Thinking and Philosophical Praxis, 2(1), 1-15.
Gregory, M.R., & Laverty, M.J. (Eds). (2018). In community of inquiry with Ann Margaret Sharp. Childhood, philosophy and education. Routledge.
Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1983). Mental models. Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Harvard University Press.
Kennedy, D. (2004). The Role of a Facilitator in a Community of Philosophical Inquiry. Metaphilosophy, 35(5), 744–765. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2004.00348.x
Kizel, A. (2021). The facilitator as self-liberator and enabler: Ethical responsibility in communities of Philosophical Inquiry. Childhood & Philosophy, 17, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.12957/childphilo.2021.53450
Lipman, M. (1995a). Moral education higher-order thinking and philosophy for children. Early Child Development and Care, 107(1), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/0300443951070108
Lipman, M. (1995b). Caring as thinking. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines, 15(1), 1-13 https://doi.org/10.5840/inquiryctnews199515128
Lipman, M. (1996). Natasha: Vygotskian dialogues. Teachers College Press.
Lipman, M. (1998). Teaching students to think reasonably: Some findings of the Philosophy for Children Program. The Clearing House, 71(5), 277-280.
Lipman, M. (2000). Stupirsi di fronte al mondo - Manuale di Kio e Gus. (M. Santi, Trans.). Liguori.
Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in education. Cambridge University Press.
Lipman, M., Sharp, A.M., & Oscanyan, F.S. (1977). Philosophy in the Classroom. Universal Diversified Services.
Lippmann, W. (2007). Public Opinion. Nu Vision Publications. (Original work published 1922).
Martin, J. R., & White, P.R.R. (2005). The language of evaluation. Appraisal in English. Palgrave Macmillan.
Marx, K., & Engels, F. (2018). L’ideologia tedesca (F. Codino, Trans.). Editori Riuniti. (Original work published 1846).
Miraglia, M. (2024). La Philosophy for Children come dispositivo educativo per contrastare lo Hate Speech nella scuola secondaria di primo grado. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Naples Federico II] http://www.fedoa.unina.it/id/eprint/15374.
Miraglia, M. (2025a). Philosophy for children as an educational tool to prevent and combat hate speech. A research intervention in an Italian school. Childhood & Philosophy, 21, 1–38. https://doi.org/10.12957/childphilo.2025.89500
Miraglia, M. (2025b). Il laboratorio di Amico Dolci: La matrice socratica e alcune affinità e differenze con la Philosophy for Children di Matthew Lipman. In C. Benelli & G. Barone (Eds.), Danilo Dolci educatore di comunità fragili. Una prospettiva multidisciplinare (pp. 99-113). Editoriale Scientifica.
Peirce, C.S. (1877). The fixation of belief. Popular Science Monthly, 12, 1-15.
Reznitskaya, A., & Gregory, M. (2013). Student thought and classroom language: Examining the mechanisms of change in dialogic teaching. Educational Psychologist, 48(2), 114–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.775898
Rodríguez-Iglesias, I. (2021). La ideología lingüística del sistema educativo. Discurso & Sociedad, 15(4), 916-949. https://doi.org/10.14198/dissoc.15.4.8
Sharp, A.M. (1995). Philosophy for children and the development of ethical values. Early Child Development and Care, 107(1), 45-55.
Sharp, A.M. (2004). The other dimension of caring thinking (with a new commentary by Phillip Cam, 2014). Journal of Philosophy in Schools, 1(1), 15–21. http://doi.org/10.21913/jps.v1i1.989
Sharp, A.M. (2005). Filosofia per i bambini: Educare un giudizio migliore. In M. Santi (Ed.), Philosophy for Children: Un curricolo per imparare a pensare (pp. 29–42). Liguori.
Tajfel, H. (1969). Cognitive aspects of prejudice. Journal of Social Issues, 25, 79-97.
Van Dijk, T. (1997). Discourse as interaction in society. In T. van Dijk, (Ed). Discourse as Social Interaction. Vol. 2 (pp. 1-37). SAGE.
Van Dijk, T. (2006). Ideology and discourse analysis. Journal of Political Ideologies, 11(2), 115–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310600687908
Van Dijk, T. (2008). Discourse and Context. A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge University Press.
Van Dijk, T. (2012). Ideology and discourse. A Multidisciplinary introduction. Barcelona. https://discourses.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Teun-A.-van-Dijk-2012-Ideology-And-Discourse.pdf
Van Dijk, T. (2014). Discorse and knowledge. A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge University Press.
Van Dijk, T. (2015). Ideología. Una aproximación multidisciplinaria. (L. Berrone de Blanco, Trans.) Editorial Gedisa. (Original work published 1998).
Van Dijk, T. (2016). Critical discourse studies: A sociocognitive approach. In Wodak, R. & Meyer, M. (Eds.), Methods of discourse studies. SAGE.
Van Dijk, T. (2023). Analyzing frame analysis: A critical review of framing studies in social movement research. Discourse Studies, 25(2), 153-178. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456231155080
Vendler, Z. (1972). Res Cogitans: An Essay in Rational Psychology. Cornell University Press.
Vygotskij, L.S. (1986). Thought and language (A. Kozulin, Trans.). The MIT Press. (Original work published 1934).
Vygotskij, L.S. (2011). Pensiero e linguaggio (L. Mecacci, Trans.). RCS. (Original work published 1934).
Wodak, R., & Mayer, M. (2015). (Eds). Methods of discourse studies. SAGE.
Downloads
Pubblicato
Come citare
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Copyright (c) 2026 Maria Miraglia
Questo lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 4.0 Internazionale.
