Valutazione tra pari in contesto universitario: Un progetto di Collaborative Online International Learning (COIL) tra Italia e Finlandia

Autori

  • Myrna Pario University of Genoa - Genoa, Italy / Istituto per le Tecnologie Didattiche (ITD), CNR - Genoa, Italy https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0375-530X
  • Olli Vesterinen Haaga-Helia University of Applied Sciences - Helsinki, Finland https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7340-758X
  • Davide Parmigiani University of Genoa - Genoa, Italy https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0985-3862
  • Elisabetta Nicchia University of Genoa - Genoa, Italy https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8196-4808
  • Emiliana Murgia University of Genoa - Genoa, Italy https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9728-1771
  • Slaviša Radović University of Genoa - Genoa, Italy https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8840-6053
  • Chiara Silvaggio University of Genoa - Genoa, Italy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60923/issn.1970-2221/21511

Parole chiave:

istruzione universitaria, valutazione tra pari, apprendimento internazionale, apprendimento online, apprendimento collaborativo

Abstract

Questo articolo presenta i risultati di un progetto di Collaborative Online International Learning (COIL) che ha coinvolto studenti dell’Università di Genova e della Haaga-Helia University of Applied Sciences di Helsinki. L’obiettivo era analizzare se e come il COIL potesse migliorare le competenze di peer-assessment, esaminando le relazioni tra aspetti collaborativi, interazione online e internazionalità. La ricerca, di tipo qualitativo, ha coinvolto 34 partecipanti (24 italiani e 10 finlandesi), di età compresa tra 26 e 40 anni, impegnati in attività sincrone e asincrone. I risultati evidenziano che il lavoro in gruppi internazionali è percepito come un contesto efficace per sviluppare abilità multilinguistiche, pensiero critico e collaborazione tra pari. In particolare, la dimensione internazionale favorisce il miglioramento delle capacità di peer-assessment, grazie al confronto con prospettive diverse che arricchiscono i processi di feedback. Inoltre, emerge una percezione positiva del COIL nella promozione di ambienti di apprendimento inclusivi, utili a preparare gli studenti alle future sfide professionali.

Riferimenti bibliografici

American Council on Education (2016). Mapping internationalization on U.S. campuses (2016 edition). Washington.

Asghar, A. (2010). Reciprocal peer coaching and its use as a formative assessment strategy for first-year students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(4), 403–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930902862834

Baker, D. F. (2007). Peer assessment in small groups: A comparison of methods. Journal of Management Education, 32(2), 183-209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562907310489

Biesma, R., Kennedy, M.-C., Pawlikowska, T., Brugha, R., Conroy, R., & Doyle, F. (2019). Peer assessment to improve medical student’s contributions to team-based projects: Randomized controlled trial and qualitative follow-up. BMC Medical Education, 19, 371. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1783-8

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5

Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Feedback in higher and professional education: Understanding it and Doing it Well. Routledge.

Cefai, C., Downes, P., & Cavioni, V. (2021). A formative, inclusive, whole school approach to the assessment of social and emotional education in the EU. Policy Report. Publications Office of the European Union/EU bookshop.

Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis (2nd ed.). SAGE.

Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research. SAGE.

Council of the European Union. (2018). Council Recommendation on Key Competences for Lifelong Learning (Document 8299/18 EDUC 133 JEUN 47 SOC 212 EMPL 154). General Secretariat of the Council. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/9ef6d96c-5e8c-11e8-ab9c-01aa75ed71a1

De Castro, A., Dyba, N., Cortez, E. D., & Benito, G. G. P. (2018). Collaborative online international learning to prepare students for multicultural work environments. Nurse Educator, 44(4), E1–E5. https://doi.org/10.1097/nne.0000000000000609

De La Espriella, R., & Restrepo, C. G. (2020). Grounded theory. Revista Colombiana De Psiquiatría (English Ed.), 49(2), 126–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcpeng.2018.08.001

Dent, A. L., & Koenka, A. C. (2016). The relation between self-regulated learning and academic achievement across childhood and adolescence: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 28(3), 425–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9320-8

de Wit, H., & Hunter, F. (2015). The future of internationalization of higher education in Europe. International Higher Education, (83), 2–3. https://doi.org/10.6017/ihe.2015.83.9073

Drigas, A., & Karyotaki, M. (2016). Online and other ICT-based Training Tools for Problem-solving Skills. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 11(06), 35. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v11i06.5340

Fredriksson, U. (2008). Learning to learn: What is it and can it be measured? Publications Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2788/83908

Grange, T., & Patera, S. (2021). La valutazione formativa per sostenere lo sviluppo della dimensione profonda dell’agire competente. Un caso di studio. Education Sciences & Society - Open Access, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.3280/ess2-2021oa12430

Green, E. C. (2001). Can qualitative research produce reliable quantitative findings? Field Methods, 13(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822x0101300101

Grion, V., Serbati, A., Tino, C., & Nicol, D. (2017). Ripensare la teoria della valutazione e dell’apprendimento all’università: Un modello per implementare pratiche di peer review. Italian Journal of Educational Research, 19, 209–226. https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/sird/article/view/2554

Guetterman, T. C., Fetters, M. D., & Creswell, J. W. (2015). Integrating quantitative and qualitative results in health science mixed methods research through joint displays. The Annals of Family Medicine, 13(6), 554–561. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1865

Harris, J. M., Seo, M., & McKeown, J. S. (2021). Global competency through Collaborative Online International Learning (COIL). 8th International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd’22). https://doi.org/10.4995/head21.2021.13080

Hackett, S., Janssen, J., Beach, P., Perreault, M., Beelen, J., & Van Tartwijk, J. (2023). The effectiveness of Collaborative Online International Learning (COIL) on intercultural competence development in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00373-3

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487

Hattie, J., & Clarke, S. (2018). Visible learning: Feedback. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429485480

Homayouni, M. (2022). Peer assessment in group-oriented classroom contexts: on the effectiveness of peer assessment coupled with scaffolding and group work on speaking skills and vocabulary learning. Language Testing in Asia 12, 61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-022-00211-3

Ingram, L. A., Monroe, C., Wright, H., Burrell, A., Jenks, R., Cheung, S., & Friedman, D. B. (2021). Fostering distance Education: Lessons from a United States-England partnered collaborative online international learning approach. Frontiers in Education, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.782674

Hildeblando, C. A., & Finardi, K. R. (2018). Internationalization and virtual collaboration: Insights from coil experiences. Ensino Em Foco, 1(2), 19–33. https://doi.orgA/10.55847/ef.v1i2.519

Kerman, N. T., Banihashem, S. K., Karami, M., Er, E., Van Ginkel, S., & Noroozi, O. (2023). Online peer feedback in higher education: A synthesis of the literature. Education and Information Technologies, 29(1), 763–813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12273-8

King de Ramírez, C. (2020). Influences of academic culture in Collaborative Online International Learning (COIL): Differences in Mexican and U.S. students’ reported experiences. Foreign Language Annals, 53(3), 438–457. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12485

King de Ramirez, C. (2021). Global citizenship education through collaborative online international learning in the borderlands: A case of the Arizona–Sonora megaregion. Journal of Studies in International Education, 25(1), 83-99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315319888886

Ligorio, M.B., & Sansone, N. (2016). Manuale di didattica blended: Il modello della Partecipazione Collaborativa e Costruttiva (PCC). Franco Angeli

Limone, P. (2012). Valutare l'apprendimento on-line. Esperienze di formazione continua dopo la laurea. Progedit.

Liu, Y. (2023). Overview of the impact of collaborative online international learning on learners. SHS Web of Conferences, 157, 04011. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202315704011

Liu, Y., & Shirley, T. (2021). Without crossing a border: Exploring the impact of shifting study abroad online on students’ learning and intercultural competence development during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Online Learning, 25(1), 182-194. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i1.2471

Mega, C., Ronconi, L., & De Beni, R. (2014). What makes a good student? How emotions, self-regulated learning, and motivation contribute to academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033546

Ndoye, A. (2017). Peer/Self assessment and student learning. The International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 29(2), 255–269. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1146193.pdf

Nicol, D., & McCallum, S. (2022). Making internal feedback explicit: Exploiting the multiple comparisons that occur during peer review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(3), 424–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1924620

Nicol, D., Thomson, A., & Breslin, C. (2013). Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: A peer review perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(1), 102–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.795518

Panadero, E., Alqassab, M., Fernández Ruiz, J., & Ocampo, J. C. (2023). A systematic review on peer assessment: Intrapersonal and interpersonal factors. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 48(8), 1053–1075. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2023.2164884

Rubin, J. (2017). Embedding Collaborative Online International Learning (COIL) at Higher Education Institutions. Internationalization of Higher Education, 2, 27–44.

Rubin, J., & Guth, S. (2015). Collaborative online international learning: An emerging format for internationalizing curricula. In A. Schultheis Moore & S. Simon (Eds.), Globally networked teaching in the humanities (pp. 15–27). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315754925

Sambell, K., McDowell, L., & Montgomery, C. (2017). Assessment for learning in higher education. Nuove prospettive e pratiche di valutazione all’università. Pensa Multimedia.

Srnka, K. J., & Koeszegi, S. T. (2007). From words to numbers: How to transform qualitative data into meaningful quantitative results. Schmalenbach Business Review, 59(1), 29–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03396741

Trinchero, R. (2004). I metodi della ricerca educativa. Laterza.

Trinchero, R. (2018). Valutazione formante per l’attivazione cognitiva. Spunti per un uso efficace delle tecnologie per apprendere in classe. Italian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(3), 40-55. https://doi.org/10.17471/2499-4324/1013

van Gennip, N. A. E., Segers, M. S. R., & Tillema, H. H. (2010). Peer assessment as a collaborative learning activity: The role of interpersonal variables and conceptions. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 280–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.010

Webb, N. M., Nemer, K. M., Chizhik, A. W., & Sugrue, B. (1998). Equity issues in collaborative group assessment: Group composition and performance. American Educational Research Journal, 35(4), 607–651. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312035004607

Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage.

Yin, S., Chen, F., & Chang, H. (2022). Assessment as learning: How does peer assessment function in students’ learning? Frontiers in Psychology 13, 912568. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.912568

Young, F. W. (1981). Quantitative analysis of qualitative data. Psychometrika, 46(4), 357–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02293796

Sitography

Ulysseus. (2025, January 15). Home - Ulysseus. https://ulysseus.eu/ (last viewed January 31st, 2025)

Van Hove, P. (2019). COIL: What’s in an acronym? (2019, November 18). https://www.eaie.org/resource/coil-acronym.html

Downloads

Pubblicato

2026-06-30

Come citare

Pario, M., Vesterinen, O., Parmigiani, D., Nicchia, E., Murgia, E., Radović, S., & Silvaggio, C. (2026). Valutazione tra pari in contesto universitario: Un progetto di Collaborative Online International Learning (COIL) tra Italia e Finlandia. Ricerche Di Pedagogia E Didattica. Journal of Theories and Research in Education, 21(1), 17–39. https://doi.org/10.60923/issn.1970-2221/21511

Fascicolo

Sezione

Articoli