Lo sforzo non valido. Analisi delle nozioni di umanità che banalizzano l’educazione degli studenti con disabilità

Autori

  • Martha Garín University of Guadalajara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1970-2221/16137

Parole chiave:

disabilità, inclusione, argomentazione, condizione umana, approccio contrattuale

Abstract

L’istruzione per le persone con disabilità è diventata una priorità in Messico, dove nonostante l’abbondanza di politiche di inclusione, la percentuale di popolazione con disabilità che frequenta la scuola è minima, per non parlare delle maggiori possibilità di abbandono e delle avversità economiche che devono affrontare. Questa ricerca si propone di comprendere le cause della loro esclusione dalle scuole elementare e media nel contesto messicano. Attraverso l’analisi di interviste a soggetti di tre diverse categorie di scuole: pubbliche, speciali e private, che accolgono studenti con disabilità, è emerso che le nozioni di umanità e normalità hanno premesse implicite sulla funzionalità e sull’utilitarismo economico, e che esiste un insostenibile ottimismo sul rendimento scolastico degli studenti. Questa ricerca rivela l’influenza della logica utilitaristica soggiacente alla tradizione politica contrattualistica sull’educazione, e solleva interrogativi sulla sua convenienza in un mondo umano, non esclusivamente razionale e i cui abitanti non sono permanentemente funzionali o ‘normali’.

Riferimenti bibliografici

Adibsereshki, N. & Salehpour, Y. (2014). Peer acceptance of students with and without inclusion experience towards students with special needs in unisex schools of Tehran. Education 3-13, 42 (6), pp. 575- 588. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2012.745890

Agamben, G. (1998). Homo sacer. El poder soberano y la nuda vida. (Gimeno, A. Trans.) Pre-Textos. (Original work: Homo sacer. Il potere sovrano e la nuda vita. Giulio Einaudi Editore, 1995).

Ahlberg, J. (2014). Educational justice for students with cognitive disabilities. Social Philosophy & Policy Foundation, 31 (1), pp. 150-175. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026505251400017X

Allman, D. (2013). The sociology of social inclusion. Sage Open, 3 (1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244012471957

Berger, P. L. & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality. Penguin books.

Coreth, E. (1976). ¿Qué es el hombre? Esquema de una antropología filosófica. (Gancho, C. Trans.) Herder. (Original work: Was ist der Mensch?, Tyrolia-Verlag, 1973).

Downing, J. & Peckham-Hardin, D. (2007). Inclusive education: what makes it a good education for students with moderate to severe disabilities?” Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 32 (1), pp. 16- 30. https://doi.org/10.2511/rpsd.32.1.16

Duncan, J., Punch, R., Gauntlett, M. & Talbot-Stokes, R. (2021). School autonomy and discrimination against students with disability in Australian primary and secondary education settings: A scoping review”. International Journal of Inclusive Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2021.1978004

Flores, J. & García, I. (2016). Apoyos que reciben estudiantes de secundaria con discapacidad en escuelas regulares: ¿Corresponden a lo que dicen las leyes? Revista Educación, 40( 2), pp. 1- 20. http://dx.doi.org/10.15517/revedu.v40i2.15851

Garnique-Castro, F. & Gutiérrez-Vidrio, S. (2012). Educación básica e inclusión: un estudio de representaciones sociales. Revista Internacional de Investigación en Educación, 4(9), pp. 577- 593.

Gevaert, J. (2008). El problema del hombre. Introducción a la antropología filosófica. (Ortiz, A. & Hernández, J. Trans.), Ediciones Sígueme. (Original work, Il problema dell’uomo. Introduzione all’antropologia filosofica, Leumann Elle Di Ci, 1992).

Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma. Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Prentice-Hall.

Hempel, C. (1999). Filosofía de la ciencia natural. (Deaño, A. Trans.) España. Alianza Editorial. (Original work: Philosophy of Natural Science, Prentice Hall, 1966).

INEGI, Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. (2017). La discapacidad en México, datos al 2014. Versión 2017. México.

INEGI, Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. (2021). Glosario de Censo de Población y Vivienda 2020. Online: https://www.inegi.org.mx/app/glosario/default.html?p=cpv2020#letraGloP (Retrieved November 27, 2023)

INEGI, Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. (2022). Tabulados discapacidad. Online: https://www.inegi.org.mx/app/tabulados/interactivos/?px=Discapacidad_01&bd=Discapacidad (Retrieved November 27, 2023)

Jackson, L., Agran, M., Lansey, K. R., Baker, D., Matthews, S., Fitzpatrick, H., Jameson, M., Ryndak, D., Burnette, K., & Taub, D. (2022). Examination of contextual variables across and within different types of placement for elementary students with complex support needs. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 47 (4), pp.191–208. doi: 10.1177/15407969221132248

Karsz, S. (2000). La exclusión: bordeando sus fronteras. Definiciones y matices. (Agoff, I. Trans.) Gedisa. (Original work, L’exclusion, définir pour en finir, Dunod, 2000).

Kuntz, E. M., & Carter, E. W. (2019). Review of interventions supporting secondary students with intellectual disability in general education classes. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 44(2), pp. 103–121, doi:10.1177/1540796919847483

Laín, P. (1998). Alma, cuerpo, persona. Galaxia Gutenberg.

Ley General de Educación, (LGE), Reformada, Diario Oficial de la Federación, (DOF), 30 de septiembre de 2019

Ley General para la Inclusión de las Personas con Discapacidad, (LGIPD), Reformada, Diario Oficial de la Federación, (DOF), 6 de enero de 2023.

Malki, S. & Einat, T. (2018). To include or not to include- this is the question: attitudes of inclusive teachers toward the inclusion of pupils with intellectual disabilities in elementary schools. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 13 (1), pp. 65- 80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1746197917705138

Nuñez, M. (1999). Desarrollo Psicológico del niño ciego. Aspectos diferenciales. Aspectos Evolutivos y Educativos de la Deficiencia Visual, 1 pp. 58-122: Organización Nacional de Ciegos Españoles.

Nussbaum, M. C. (2007). Frontiers of Justice. Disability, nationality, species membership. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Olkin, R. (2002). Could you hold the door for me? Including disability in diversity. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 8(2), pp.130-137. https://doi.org/10.1037/1099-9809.8.2.130

World Health Organization & The World Bank. (2011). World report on disability. Geneva, Switzerland.

Pierson, M. & Howell, E. (2013). Two high schools and the road to full inclusion: A comparison study. Improving Schools, 16(3), pp. 223-231, doi: 10.1177/1365480213501063.

Romero, S. & García, I. (2013). Educación especial en México. Desafíos de la educación inclusiva. Revista Latinoamericana de Educación Inclusiva, 7(2), pp. 77-91.

SEP, Secretaría de Educación Pública. (2006). Orientaciones generales para el funcionamiento de los servicios de educación especial. México.

Shakespeare, T. (2006). The social model of disability. In L. J. Davis (Ed.), The disability studies reader. (197-204).Taylor & Francis.

Shakespeare, T. (2014). Disability rights and wrongs revisited. Routledge.

Van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R. & Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (2002). Argumentation: analysis, evaluation, presentation. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Velarde, V. (2012). Los modelos de la discapacidad: un recorrido histórico. Revista Empresa y Humanismo, 15(1), pp. 115- 136. https://doi.org/10.15581/015.15.4179

Waisath, W., McCormack, M., Stek, P. & Heymann, J. (2022). Dismantling barriers and advancing disability-inclusive education: an examination of national laws and policies across 193 countries. International Journal of Inclusive Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2022.2058623

Wei, X. & Marder, C. (2012). Self-concept development of students with disabilities: disability category, gender, and racial differences from early elementary to high school. Remedial and Special Education, 33(4), pp. 247-257. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932510394872

Worth, N. (2013). Making friends and fitting in: a social-relational understanding of disability at school. Social and Cultural Geography, 14(1), pp. 103- 123. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2012.735693

Downloads

Pubblicato

2023-12-27

Come citare

Garín, M. (2023). Lo sforzo non valido. Analisi delle nozioni di umanità che banalizzano l’educazione degli studenti con disabilità. Ricerche Di Pedagogia E Didattica. Journal of Theories and Research in Education, 18(3), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1970-2221/16137

Fascicolo

Sezione

Articoli