Enhancing peer-assessment in higher education within a Collaborative Online International Learning (COIL) project between Italy and Finland
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60923/issn.1970-2221/21511Keywords:
higher education, peer assessment, international learning, online learning, collaborative learningAbstract
This article reports the results of a Collaborative Online International Learning (COIL) project involving students from the University of Genoa and Haaga-Helia University of Applied Sciences in Helsinki. It aimed to explore whether and how COIL can enhance peer-assessment skills by examining the relationships between its three core elements: collaboration, online interaction, and internationality. A qualitative research design was chosen, involving 34 participants (24 Italians and 10 Finns) aged 26 to 40, who worked together through synchronous and asynchronous tasks. The findings show that international teamwork is perceived as an effective context for developing soft skills such as multilingualism, critical thinking, and peer collaboration. In particular, the international dimension was perceived as especially valuable in improving peer-assessment skills, as exposure to diverse perspectives enriched feedback processes. Moreover, results underscore the positive perception COIL’s role in fostering inclusive learning environments that prepare students to address future professional challenges effectively.
References
American Council on Education (2016). Mapping internationalization on U.S. campuses (2016 edition). Washington.
Asghar, A. (2010). Reciprocal peer coaching and its use as a formative assessment strategy for first-year students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(4), 403–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930902862834
Baker, D. F. (2007). Peer assessment in small groups: A comparison of methods. Journal of Management Education, 32(2), 183-209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562907310489
Biesma, R., Kennedy, M.-C., Pawlikowska, T., Brugha, R., Conroy, R., & Doyle, F. (2019). Peer assessment to improve medical student’s contributions to team-based projects: Randomized controlled trial and qualitative follow-up. BMC Medical Education, 19, 371. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1783-8
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Feedback in higher and professional education: Understanding it and Doing it Well. Routledge.
Cefai, C., Downes, P., & Cavioni, V. (2021). A formative, inclusive, whole school approach to the assessment of social and emotional education in the EU. Policy Report. Publications Office of the European Union/EU bookshop.
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis (2nd ed.). SAGE.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research. SAGE.
Council of the European Union. (2018). Council Recommendation on Key Competences for Lifelong Learning (Document 8299/18 EDUC 133 JEUN 47 SOC 212 EMPL 154). General Secretariat of the Council. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/9ef6d96c-5e8c-11e8-ab9c-01aa75ed71a1
De Castro, A., Dyba, N., Cortez, E. D., & Benito, G. G. P. (2018). Collaborative online international learning to prepare students for multicultural work environments. Nurse Educator, 44(4), E1–E5. https://doi.org/10.1097/nne.0000000000000609
De La Espriella, R., & Restrepo, C. G. (2020). Grounded theory. Revista Colombiana De Psiquiatría (English Ed.), 49(2), 126–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcpeng.2018.08.001
Dent, A. L., & Koenka, A. C. (2016). The relation between self-regulated learning and academic achievement across childhood and adolescence: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 28(3), 425–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9320-8
de Wit, H., & Hunter, F. (2015). The future of internationalization of higher education in Europe. International Higher Education, (83), 2–3. https://doi.org/10.6017/ihe.2015.83.9073
Drigas, A., & Karyotaki, M. (2016). Online and other ICT-based Training Tools for Problem-solving Skills. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 11(06), 35. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v11i06.5340
Fredriksson, U. (2008). Learning to learn: What is it and can it be measured? Publications Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2788/83908
Grange, T., & Patera, S. (2021). La valutazione formativa per sostenere lo sviluppo della dimensione profonda dell’agire competente. Un caso di studio. Education Sciences & Society - Open Access, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.3280/ess2-2021oa12430
Green, E. C. (2001). Can qualitative research produce reliable quantitative findings? Field Methods, 13(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822x0101300101
Grion, V., Serbati, A., Tino, C., & Nicol, D. (2017). Ripensare la teoria della valutazione e dell’apprendimento all’università: Un modello per implementare pratiche di peer review. Italian Journal of Educational Research, 19, 209–226. https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/sird/article/view/2554
Guetterman, T. C., Fetters, M. D., & Creswell, J. W. (2015). Integrating quantitative and qualitative results in health science mixed methods research through joint displays. The Annals of Family Medicine, 13(6), 554–561. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1865
Harris, J. M., Seo, M., & McKeown, J. S. (2021). Global competency through Collaborative Online International Learning (COIL). 8th International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd’22). https://doi.org/10.4995/head21.2021.13080
Hackett, S., Janssen, J., Beach, P., Perreault, M., Beelen, J., & Van Tartwijk, J. (2023). The effectiveness of Collaborative Online International Learning (COIL) on intercultural competence development in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00373-3
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Hattie, J., & Clarke, S. (2018). Visible learning: Feedback. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429485480
Homayouni, M. (2022). Peer assessment in group-oriented classroom contexts: on the effectiveness of peer assessment coupled with scaffolding and group work on speaking skills and vocabulary learning. Language Testing in Asia 12, 61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-022-00211-3
Ingram, L. A., Monroe, C., Wright, H., Burrell, A., Jenks, R., Cheung, S., & Friedman, D. B. (2021). Fostering distance Education: Lessons from a United States-England partnered collaborative online international learning approach. Frontiers in Education, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.782674
Hildeblando, C. A., & Finardi, K. R. (2018). Internationalization and virtual collaboration: Insights from coil experiences. Ensino Em Foco, 1(2), 19–33. https://doi.orgA/10.55847/ef.v1i2.519
Kerman, N. T., Banihashem, S. K., Karami, M., Er, E., Van Ginkel, S., & Noroozi, O. (2023). Online peer feedback in higher education: A synthesis of the literature. Education and Information Technologies, 29(1), 763–813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12273-8
King de Ramírez, C. (2020). Influences of academic culture in Collaborative Online International Learning (COIL): Differences in Mexican and U.S. students’ reported experiences. Foreign Language Annals, 53(3), 438–457. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12485
King de Ramirez, C. (2021). Global citizenship education through collaborative online international learning in the borderlands: A case of the Arizona–Sonora megaregion. Journal of Studies in International Education, 25(1), 83-99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315319888886
Ligorio, M.B., & Sansone, N. (2016). Manuale di didattica blended: Il modello della Partecipazione Collaborativa e Costruttiva (PCC). Franco Angeli
Limone, P. (2012). Valutare l'apprendimento on-line. Esperienze di formazione continua dopo la laurea. Progedit.
Liu, Y. (2023). Overview of the impact of collaborative online international learning on learners. SHS Web of Conferences, 157, 04011. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202315704011
Liu, Y., & Shirley, T. (2021). Without crossing a border: Exploring the impact of shifting study abroad online on students’ learning and intercultural competence development during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Online Learning, 25(1), 182-194. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i1.2471
Mega, C., Ronconi, L., & De Beni, R. (2014). What makes a good student? How emotions, self-regulated learning, and motivation contribute to academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033546
Ndoye, A. (2017). Peer/Self assessment and student learning. The International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 29(2), 255–269. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1146193.pdf
Nicol, D., & McCallum, S. (2022). Making internal feedback explicit: Exploiting the multiple comparisons that occur during peer review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(3), 424–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1924620
Nicol, D., Thomson, A., & Breslin, C. (2013). Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: A peer review perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(1), 102–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.795518
Panadero, E., Alqassab, M., Fernández Ruiz, J., & Ocampo, J. C. (2023). A systematic review on peer assessment: Intrapersonal and interpersonal factors. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 48(8), 1053–1075. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2023.2164884
Rubin, J. (2017). Embedding Collaborative Online International Learning (COIL) at Higher Education Institutions. Internationalization of Higher Education, 2, 27–44.
Rubin, J., & Guth, S. (2015). Collaborative online international learning: An emerging format for internationalizing curricula. In A. Schultheis Moore & S. Simon (Eds.), Globally networked teaching in the humanities (pp. 15–27). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315754925
Sambell, K., McDowell, L., & Montgomery, C. (2017). Assessment for learning in higher education. Nuove prospettive e pratiche di valutazione all’università. Pensa Multimedia.
Srnka, K. J., & Koeszegi, S. T. (2007). From words to numbers: How to transform qualitative data into meaningful quantitative results. Schmalenbach Business Review, 59(1), 29–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03396741
Trinchero, R. (2004). I metodi della ricerca educativa. Laterza.
Trinchero, R. (2018). Valutazione formante per l’attivazione cognitiva. Spunti per un uso efficace delle tecnologie per apprendere in classe. Italian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(3), 40-55. https://doi.org/10.17471/2499-4324/1013
van Gennip, N. A. E., Segers, M. S. R., & Tillema, H. H. (2010). Peer assessment as a collaborative learning activity: The role of interpersonal variables and conceptions. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 280–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.010
Webb, N. M., Nemer, K. M., Chizhik, A. W., & Sugrue, B. (1998). Equity issues in collaborative group assessment: Group composition and performance. American Educational Research Journal, 35(4), 607–651. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312035004607
Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage.
Yin, S., Chen, F., & Chang, H. (2022). Assessment as learning: How does peer assessment function in students’ learning? Frontiers in Psychology 13, 912568. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.912568
Young, F. W. (1981). Quantitative analysis of qualitative data. Psychometrika, 46(4), 357–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02293796
Sitography
Ulysseus. (2025, January 15). Home - Ulysseus. https://ulysseus.eu/ (last viewed January 31st, 2025)
Van Hove, P. (2019). COIL: What’s in an acronym? (2019, November 18). https://www.eaie.org/resource/coil-acronym.html
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Myrna Pario, Olli Vesterinen, Davide Parmigiani, Elisabetta Nicchia, Emiliana Murgia, Slaviša Radović, Chiara Silvaggio

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.