Montessori in Italian primary schools today: Some issues raised by an empirical study

Authors

  • Stefano Scippo Università degli Studi di Firenze

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1970-2221/16663

Keywords:

Montessori education, primary schools, academic outcomes, socio-affective outcomes, teacher profiles

Abstract

This study aims to contribute to the evaluation of Montessori education in Italian primary schools, examining a) its impact on academic and socio-affective outcomes; b) teacher profiles and the fidelity of their implementation. The results show that Montessori students, depending on grade and cohort, achieve similar or significantly higher scores than other students. Additionally, in some cases the distributions of math scores have a significantly higher standard deviation. Regarding socio-affective characteristics, Montessori students score significantly higher on the empathy scale. These results, combined with the fact that only half of Montessori teachers have a more orthodox profile, highlight how the Montessori model conflicts with some features of the Italian primary school system. This raises some questions concerning evaluation, limits to children’s freedom of choice and movement, individualization, organization of work time, and multi-age classrooms.

References

Bailey, K.D. (1982). Methods of Social Research. The Free Press. [trad. it. Metodi della ricerca sociale, a cura di Maurizio Rossi, Il Mulino, 1995].

Becchi, E. (1997). Sperimentare nella scuola. Storia, problemi, prospettive. La Nuova Italia.

Bonino, S., Lo Coco, A., Tani, F. (1998). Empatia. I processi di condivisione delle emozioni. Giunti.

Cives, G. (2001). Montessori pedagogista complessa. Edizioni ETS.

Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T (1979). Quasi-experimentation. Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Houghton Mifflin.

Cook, T. D., Campbell, D. T., Peracchio, L. (1990). Quasi-experimentation. In M. D. Dunnette, L. M. Hough (eds), Handbook of Industrial Organizational Psychology (pp. 491-576), Consulting Psychologist.

Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 16–29.

Kankaraš, M., & Suarez-Alvarez, J. (2019). Assessment framework of the OECD Study on Social and Emotional Skills. Paris: OECD Education Working Papers, No. 207, OECD Publishing.

Marshall, C. (2017). Montessori education: a review of the evidence base. NPJ Science of Learning 2, 27 Ottobre 2017, articolo n. 11.

Montessori, M. (1991). Educazione per un mondo nuovo. Garzanti [Ed. Orig. del 1947, Education for a New World, Adyar Madras: Kalakshetra Publications].

Moretti, G., Biasci, V., Giuliani, A., Morini, A. (2017). Sviluppo delle capacità di problem solving nella scuola secondaria di primo grado e apprendimento logico-linguistico e logico-matematico. Adattamento e validazione in Italia “della versione breve” del Test della “Personalità Creativa” (TCD-As). Giornale italiano della ricerca educativa, anno X, 115-128.

Morin, E. (1974). Il paradigma perduto. Che cos’è la natura umana. Bompiani. [Opera originale pubblicata 1973]

Murray, A.K., Daoust, C.J., Chen, J. (2019). Developing Instruments to Measure Montessori Instructional Practices. Journal of Montessori Research, 5, 75-87.

Pesci, F. (2015). Il “fenomeno” Montessori: complessità, contraddizioni e il grande retaggio dell’attivismo pedagogico. In M. Baldacci, F. Frabboni e M. Zabalza (a cura di), Maria Montessori e la scuola d’infanzia a nuovo indirizzo (pp. 75-86), Zeroseiup.

Pironi, T. (2023) (a cura di). Maria Montessori tra passato e presente. La diffusione della sua pedagogia in Italia e all’estero, Franco Angeli.

Phillips, J., & Springer, F. (1992). Extended National Youth Sports Program 1991-92 evaluation highlights, part two: Individual Protective Factors Index (IPFI) and risk assessment study. Report prepared for the National Collegiate Athletic Association. Sacramento, CA: EMT Associates. (Unpublished).

Scippo, S. (2022). La recente crescita e l’attuale diffusione delle sezioni di scuola primaria Montessori in Italia. Studium Educationis, XXIII – 1 – Giugno 2022, 4-17, doi: 10.7346/SE-012022-01.

Turco, R. (2016). I maestri montessoriani in Europa. Profili e identità fra tradizione e trasformazione. Tesi di Dottorato di ricerca in Pedagogia generale, Pedagogia sociale e Didattica generale, XXIX ciclo, Libera Università di Bolzano.

Trabalzini, P. (2021). Uno sguardo d’insieme sul Montessori. Vita dell’infanzia, 3-4, 4-15.

Vecchio, G.V., Gerbino, M., Pastorelli, C., Del Bove, G., Caprara, G.V. (2007). Multi-faceted self-efficacy beliefs as predictors of life satisfaction in late adolescence, Personality and Individual Differences, 43(7), 1807-1818.

Visalberghi, A. (1990). Insegnare ed apprendere, un approccio evolutivo. Firenze: La Nuova Italia [Opera originale pubblicata 1988].

Zimprich, D., Perren, S., Hornung, R. (2005). A Two-Level Confirmatory Factor Analysis of a Modified Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement - EDUC PSYCHOL MEAS, 65, 465-481.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-27

How to Cite

Scippo, S. (2023). Montessori in Italian primary schools today: Some issues raised by an empirical study. Ricerche Di Pedagogia E Didattica. Journal of Theories and Research in Education, 18(3), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1970-2221/16663

Issue

Section

Articles