The co-design of the curriculum in the context of the Higher Education. A case study on the Course for the qualification of socio-pedagogical educator
Keywords:Curriculum design, co-design, learning outcomes, Higher Education, sociopedagogical educator
The study investigates benefits, criticalities and challenges of the co-design of a training programme based on learning outcomes and the transferability of the strategy to other educational contexts, through the analysis of the perceptions of the Professors involved in the design of the course for "Professional Socio- pedagogical educator" at the University of Florence. Following the analysis of the interviews with Professors on the collaborative design of this curriculum, some results align with previous studies while allowing to explore opportunities to advance knowledge on the subject. This design approach is not without its challenges, in particular with regard to the lexical divergence of the disciplines and the difficulty of negotiating knowledge within shared practices. Furthermore, the focus on the learning outcomes, also promoted through their declinations into different didactic formats, would appear relevant in conjunction with an approach centred on learners. Finally, the transferability of the practice appears to be linked to elements of the organization and structure of the academic context, which should facilitate the effort necessary to deploy the resources that co-design implies in its implementation.
Barnett, R. & Coate, K. (2005). Engaging the curriculum in higher education. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Becuwe, H., Tondeur, J., Pareja Roblin, N., Thys, J., & Castelein, E. (2016). Teacher design teams as a strategy for professional development: The role of the facilitator. Educational Research and Evaluation, 22(3-4), 141-154.
Bernstein, B. (1975). Class, codes and control: towards a theory of educational transmission. London: Routledge.
Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32(3), 347–364.
Binkhorst, F., Handelzalts, A., Poortman, C. L., & Van Joolingen, W. R. (2015). Understanding teacher design teams–A mixed methods approach to developing a descriptive framework. Teaching and teacher education, 51, 213-224.
Boschman, F. B. (2015). Collaborative design of ICT-rich early literacy learning material: Design talk in teacher teams (Doctoral dissertation). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente.
Bovill, C., & Woolmer, C. (2019). How conceptualisations of curriculum in higher education influence student-staff co-creation in and of the curriculum. Higher Education, 78, 407–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0349-8
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Bruni, I., Ranieri, M., & Gabbi, E. (2020). E-portfolio e lifelong learning: uno studio sul design dei dispositivi valutativi tra formale e informale. In: Learning, Competencies and Human Resources, Foggia, 9-11 Settembre 2019, SIe-L EDITORE, vol. 8, pp. 58-63.
Cober, R., Tan, E., Slotta, J., So, H. J., & Könings, K. D. (2015). Teachers as participatory designers: Two case studies with technology-enhanced learning environments. Instructional Science, 43(2), 203-228.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (2009). Teacher research as stance. The SAGE handbook of educational action research, 39-49.
Fabbri, L. (2018). La costruzione dei contenuti core come pratica scientifica condivisa. Metodologie per la trasformazione della progettazione dell’offerta formativa. Form@re - Open Journal per la formazione in rete, 18(3), 61-69.
Fabbri, L., Giampaolo, M., Romano, A. (2018). In principio era il decreto. Verso una progettazione condivisa tra insider e outsider. Form@re - Open Journal per la formazione in rete, 18(3), 94-107.
Federighi, P. (2018a). I contenuti core per la formazione universitaria dei professionisti dell’educazione e della formazione. Form@re - Open Journal per la formazione in rete, 18(3), 19–36.
Federighi, P. (2018b). Educazione in età adulta. Ricerche, politiche, luoghi e professioni. Firenze: Firenze University Press.
Federighi, P., Bracci, F., Del Gobbo, G., Torlone, F., & Torre, E. (2019). Framework. TecoD Pedagogia (Scienze dell’educazione e della formazione L-19). https://www.anvur.it/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/TECOD-Pedagogia.pdf
Fraser, S., & Bosanquet, A. (2006). The curriculum? That’s just a unit outline, isn’t it? Studies in Higher Education, 31(3), 269–284.
Gabbi, E., Gaggioli, C., & Ranieri, M. (in revisione). Smart welfare: The work of the educator at the time of covid-19. Italian Journal of Educational Technology.
Gendole, A. A. (2013). Collaborative teacher professional development in Ethiopian higher education: The case of collaborative language teaching (Doctoral dissertation). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente.
Knight, P. (2001). Complexity and curriculum: a process approach to curriculum-making. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(3), 369–381.
McCune, V., & Hounsell, D. (2005). The development of students’ ways of thinking and practising in three final year biology courses. Higher Education, 49(3), 255–289.
Pareja Roblin, N. N., Ormel, B. J., McKenney, S. E., Voogt, J. M., & Pieters, J. M. (2014). Linking research and practice through teacher communities: a place where formal and practical knowledge meet?. European journal of teacher education, 37(2), 183-203.
Ranieri, M. (2005). E-learning: modelli e strategie didattiche (Vol. 3). Trento: Edizioni Erickson.
Ranieri, M., & Giampaolo, M (2018). Educators at university. A blended and problem based teaching model for the training course of “socio-pedagogical educator. Form@re - Open Journal per la formazione in rete, vol. 18, pp. 108-125
Ranieri, M., Boffo, V., & Fabbro, F. (2019). Teaching and researching relational and communication dynamics for education. In: INTED2019 Conference, Valencia, Spain, 11th-13th March 2019, IATED Academy, pp. 2152-2157.
Ranieri, M., Giampaolo, M., & Bruni, I. (2019). Exploring educators’ professional learning ecologies in a blended learning environment. British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 50, pp. 1673-1686.
Torlone, F. (2018). Methods, tools and instruments for the core contents’ definition of the First degree in Education Sciences. Form@re-Open Journal per la formazione in rete, 18(3), 37-60.
Voogt, J. M., Pieters, J. M., & Handelzalts, A. (2016) Teacher collaboration in curriculum design teams: effects, mechanisms, and conditions, Educational Research and Evaluation, 22(3-4), 121-140, https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2016.1247725
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 3rd. Edn. Thousand Oaks-London-New Delhi: Sage.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2022 Francesco Fabbro, Elena Gabbi, Maria Ranieri, Marta Pellegrini
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.