Enhancing professional vocabulary acquisition through cognitive approaches in CLIL curricula

Valentyna Borshchovetska; Tetiana Harbuza; Alla Durdas; Alla Nypadymka; Yuliia Radchenko; Oleh Zatserkovnyi

doi:10.6092/issn.1970-2221/18828

Autori

Valentyna Borshchovetska State University of Trade and Economics, Kyiv

Valentyna Borshchovetska is a PhD in Education and an Associate Professor at the State University of Trade and Economics, Ukraine. She specializes in the cognitive approach to L2 vocabulary acquisition, mnemonics in memorizing L2 vocabulary, cognitive processing models in professional translation, and modelling self-study work for university students learning foreign languages. Since 2022, she has served as an Associate Professor in the Department of Modern European Languages. Dr. Borshchovetska earned her PhD with a thesis on “Teaching English Vocabulary to Economics Students” in 2004. She holds a specialist’s degree in foreign languages from Kyiv Linguistic University, where she qualified as a teacher of English and German in 1987. She has been a lecturer in English and German languages since 1987.
Tetiana Harbuza State University of Trade and Economics, Kyiv

Tetiana Harbuza holds a PhD in Education and is an Associate Professor and Head of the Department of Modern European Languages at the State University of Trade and Economics in Kyiv, Ukraine. She obtained her specialist's degree in foreign languages teaching from Tomsk State Pedagogical University in 2000 and her PhD in Education from Zhytomyr Ivan Franko State University in 2015. With expertise in modern language teaching methods, advanced technologies, and intercultural communication, she has been the head of the department since 2021.
Alla Durdas State University of Trade and Economics, Kyiv

Alla Durdas is a PhD in Education and Associate Professor at the State University of Trade and Economics in Ukraine. Her research spans the methodology of teaching foreign languages, translation studies, comparative studies, and the evaluation of higher education quality. Since 2022, she has held the position of Associate Professor in the Department of Modern European Languages. With a diverse academic background, including roles as a Senior Lecturer and Editor, Alla contributes significantly to language education and research.
Alla Nypadymka State University of Trade and Economics, Kyiv

Alla Nypadymka holds a PhD in Philology and is an Associate Professor at the State University of Trade and Economics in Ukraine. Her research expertise includes linguopoetics, intercultural communication, and the use of modern technologies and methods in teaching foreign languages. Since 2020, she has served as an Associate Professor in the Department of Modern European Languages, bringing a wealth of experience to language education.
Yuliia Radchenko State University of Trade and Economics, Kyiv

Yuliia Radchenko is a Senior Lecturer at the State University of Trade and Economics in Ukraine. Specializing in modern language teaching methods, advanced technologies, distance learning, and intercultural communication, Yuliia has been with the Department of Modern European Languages since 2021. Her academic journey includes roles as a Lecturer at Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics, a Researcher at the Institute of Pedagogy, and teaching positions at various educational institutions.
Oleh Zatserkovnyi State University of Trade and Economics, Kyiv

Oleh Zatserkovnyi is a Senior Lecturer at the State University of Trade and Economics in Ukraine. With a research focus on the use of modern technologies and methods in teaching foreign languages, particularly the integration of IT technologies, Oleh has been contributing to language education since 2002. He has held the position of Senior Lecturer of English at the Department of Modern European Languages, Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics, since 2018.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1970-2221/18828

Parole chiave:

curricoli CLIL, strategie cognitive, vocabolario professionale, acquisizione del vocabolario

Abstract

Questo studio indaga l’impatto delle strategie cognitive sull’acquisizione del vocabolario professionale nei curricoli CLIL, utilizzando un approccio misto. I risultati dell'analisi quantitativa, in particolare un test ANCOVA, respingono decisamente l’ipotesi nulla e rivelano miglioramenti significativi nella competenza lessicale grazie alle strategie cognitive mirate. L’analisi tematica dei feedback degli studenti supporta l’efficacia di tali strategie nella creazione di esperienze di apprendimento interattive. Il Gruppo Sperimentale (GS) dimostra costantemente un’acquisizione migliorata del vocabolario, soprattutto a livelli avanzati, mentre il Gruppo di Controllo (GC) mostra una competenza stabile con progressi minori. Questa divergenza è attribuita all'applicazione delle strategie cognitive da parte del GS. Lo studio sottolinea l'importanza dell'integrazione delle strategie cognitive nei curricoli CLIL, sottolineando la personalizzazione per affrontare sfide uniche. La ricerca futura dovrebbe esplorare gli effetti a lungo termine sulla ritenzione del vocabolario, la loro applicabilità in diverse materie e metodi efficaci per formare gli educatori nell'implementazione di queste strategie in vari contesti educativi.

Riferimenti bibliografici

Atsari, F. (2017). Strategies in vocabulary acquisition. In Rakhmawati (Eds), Proceedings of the International Conference on English Language Teaching (ICONELT 2017): Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (pp. 119-125), Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/iconelt-17.2018.27

Banegas, D. L. (2011). A review of “CLIL: content and language integrated learning”. Language and Education, 25(2), 182-185. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2010.539045

Borshchovetska, V., Molotkina, Y., Vitomska, N., Serhiienko, I., & Turitsyna, O. (2022). Overcoming vocabulary-related anxieties in students when communicating in the media internationally. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 8(3), 431-447. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.8.3.431

Bošnjak Terzić, B., & Pavičić Takač, V. (2020). Cognitive and metacognitive vocabulary learning strategies: Insights from learning diaries. In M. Dodigovic, & M. Agustín-Llach (eds), Vocabulary in Curriculum Planning (pp. 121-142). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48663-1_7

Budiman, B., Ishak, J. I. P., Rohani, R., Lalu, L. M. H., & Jaelani, S. R. J. M. (2023). Enhancing English Language proficiency: Strategies for improving student skills. Journal of Scientific Research, Education, and Technology (JSRET), 2(3), 1118–1123. https://doi.org/10.58526/jsret.v2i3.205

Corino, E., & Onesti, C. (2019). Data-driven learning: A scaffolding methodology for CLIL and LSP teaching and learning. Frontiers in Education, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00007

Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL as a theoretical concept. In CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL, pp. 27-47). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024549.003

Dalton-Puffer, C. (2011). Content-and-Language Integrated Learning: From Practice to Principles? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 182-204. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190511000092

Dalton-Puffer, C., & Smit, U. (2013). Content and Language Integrated Learning: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 46(4), 545-559. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444813000256

Darvin, R., Lo, Y.Y. & Lin, A.M.Y. (2020). Examining CLIL through a critical lens. English Teaching & Learning, 44, 103–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321-020-00062-2

Dias, S. B., Hadjileontiadou, S. J., Diniz, J. A., & Hadjileontiadis, L. J. (2017). Computer-based concept mapping combined with learning management system use. Computer and Education, 107(C), 127–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.009

Duarte, J., García-Jimenez, E., McMonagle, S., Hansen, A., Gross, B., Szelei, N., & Pinho, A. S. (2023). Research priorities in the field of multilingualism and language education: a cross-national examination. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 44(1), 50-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2020.1792475

Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612453266

East, M. (2015). Task-based teaching and learning: Pedagogical implications. In N. Van Deusen-Scholl & S. May, (eds.), Second and Foreign Language Education. Encyclopedia of Language and Education (pp. 1-11). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02323-6_8-1

Eslami, Z. R., & Geng, Z. (2021). Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL). In H. Mohebbi, & C. Coombe (eds), Research Questions in Language Education and Applied Linguistics (pp. 23-27). Springer Texts in Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79143-8_4

Fajardo Dack, T. M., Argudo, J., & Abad, M. (2020). Language and teaching methodology features of CLIL in university classrooms: A research synthesis. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 22(1), 40–54. https://doi.org/10.14483/22487085.13878

Fang, F., Zhang, L. J., & Sah, P. K. (2022). Translanguaging in language teaching and learning: Current practices and future directions. RELC Journal, 53(2), 305-312. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882221114478

Filippi, R., Periche-Tomas, E., Papageorgiou, A., Bairaktari, O., & Bright, P. (2020). Multilanguage acquisition and cognitive development. In K. C. Kadosh (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience. Oxford Academic https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198827474.013.20

Gabillon, Z. (2020). Revisiting CLIL: Background, pedagogy, and theoretical underpinnings. Contexts and Didactics / Contextes et Didactiques, 15. https://doi.org/10.4000/ced.1836

Hayashi, Y. (2019). Investigating effects of working memory training on foreign language development. The Modern Language Journal, 103, 665–685. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12584

Hemmi, C., & Banegas, D. L. (2021). CLIL: An overview. In C. Hemmi, & D. L. Banegas (eds), International Perspectives on CLIL. International Perspectives on English Language Teaching (pp. 1-20). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70095-9_1

Karousou, A., & Nerantzaki, T. (2020). Phonological memory training and its effect on second language vocabulary development. Second Language Research, 38(1), 31-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658319898514

Kinchin, I. M. (2014). Concept mapping as a learning tool in higher education: A critical analysis of recent reviews. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 62(1), 39-49. https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2014.872011

Li, M. (2021). Corpus analysis and corpus-based writing instruction. In M. Li (ed), Researching and Teaching Second Language Writing in the Digital Age (pp. 183-216). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87710-1_8

Llinares, A., & Dalton-Puffer, C. (2015). The role of different tasks in CLIL students’ use of evaluative language. System, 54, 69-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.05.001

Liu, T., Zhang, Z., & Gao, X. (2023). Pedagogical design in technology-enhanced language education research: A scoping review. Sustainability, 15(7), Article 6069. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15076069

Memon, M. A., Abbasi, A. M., Niazi, S., Husain, I., & Junaid, S. S. (2023). Vocabulary acquisition through content and language-integrated learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 18(12), 142–157. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i12.39287

Mukoroli, J. (2011). Effective vocabulary teaching strategies for the English for Academic Purposes ESL classroom [Master of Arts Thesis in Teaching degree], TESOL Collection. 501. https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/ipp_collection/501

Naeimi, M., & Foo, T. C. V. (2015). Vocabulary acquisition through direct and indirect learning strategies. English Language Teaching, 8(10), 142-151. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n10p142

Nugent, W. R. (2017). Understanding DIF and DTF: Description, methods, and implications for social work research. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 8(2), 305-334. https://doi.org/10.1086/691525

Nozhovnik, O., Harbuza, T., Starosta, H., Radchenko, Y., & Zatserkovnyi, O. (2022). Best practices of fostering undergraduates’ cross-cultural competence involving training them in foreign languages: Systemic review. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 8(4), 655-668. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.8.4.655

Ortega, L. (2015). Researching CLIL and TBLT interfaces. System, 54, 103-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.09.002

Otter. (2020). Otter for education [Web and Mobile app]. Otter.ai. https://otter.ai/edu

Pellicer-Sánchez, A. (2020). Expanding English Vocabulary Knowledge through Reading: Insights from Eye-tracking Studies. RELC Journal, 51(1), 134-146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220906904

SocioCultural Research Consultants. (2023). Dedoose [Web software]. Dedoose. https://www.dedoose.com/

Susanto, A. (2017). The teaching of vocabulary: A perspective. Journal KATA/Jurnal KATA, 1(2), 182-191. https://shorturl.at/CFIJ5

Tapia, J. L., & Duñabeitia, J. A. (2021). Improving language acquisition and processing with cognitive Stimulation. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 663773. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.663773

Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. SAGE Publications, Inc., https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506335193

Woźniak, M. (2017). ESP in CLIL degree programmes. ESP Today, 5(2), 244–265. https://doi.org/10.18485/esptoday.2017.5.2.6

Yusoff, M. S. B. (2019). ABC of content validation and content validity index calculation. Education in Medicine Journal, 11(2), 49–54. https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2019.11.2.6

Zarifi, A., & Azizinezhad, Z. (2020). Vocabulary learning and retention: Cognitive load framework on trial. Porta Linguarum - An International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Learning, 33, 265–278. https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.vi33.26660

Miglioramento dell’acquisizione del vocabolario professionale attraverso approcci cognitivi nei curricula CLIL

Autori

DOI:

Parole chiave:

Abstract

Riferimenti bibliografici

Downloads

Pubblicato

Come citare

Fascicolo

Sezione

Licenza

Lingua

Fai una proposta

Ultimo numero