From novice to tech savvy teachers. A Report of Faculty Members’ Teaching with Technology Experiences
Keywords:technology, teaching, e-learning, motivation, hybrid hourse
AbstractThis study explores faculty motivations to adopt technologies for their courses, their current uses of technologies and perceptions of teaching with technologies, as well as their suggestions for how their institutions can best support them. In particular, this investigation compares novice and tech savvy teachers by looking at differences in the technologies they use, how they integrate these technologies in their courses, and the challenges they experience in doing so.
Allen, T. H. (2006). Is the rush to provide on-line instruction setting our students up for failure? Communication Education, 55(1), 122-126.
Amrein-Beardsley, A., Foulger, T. S., & Toth, M. (2007). Examining the development of a hybrid degree program: Using student and instructor data to inform decision-making. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(4), 331-357.
Anderson, L. E. & Carta-Falsa, J. (2002). Factors that make faculty and student relationships effective. College Teaching, 50(4), 134-138.
Bruns, A., & Humphreys, S. (2005). Wikis in teaching and assessment: The M/Cyclopedia project. Proceedings of the International Wiki Symposium, San Diego. ACM. http://eprints.qut.edu.au/archive/00002289/
Dykman, C. A & Davis, C. K. (2008). Online education forum: Part two - teaching online versus teaching conventionally. Journal of Information Systems Education, 19(2), 157-164.
Friel, T., Britten, J., Compton, B., Peak, A. Schoch, K. & VanTyle, W. K. (2009).
Using pedagogical dialogue as a vehicle to encourage faculty technology use. Computers & Education, 53, 300-307.
Gallini, J. L., & Barron, D. (2002). Participants’ perceptions of Web-infused environments: A survey of teaching beliefs, learning approaches, and communication. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(2), 139-156.
Georgina, D. A & Hosford, C. C. (2009). Higher education faculty perceptions on technology integration and training. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 690-696.
Georgina, D. A. & Olson, M. R. (2008). Integration of technology in higher education: A review of faculty self-perceptions. Internet and Higher Education, 11, 1-8.
Hermann, S. C. (1999). Asking the hard questions: About technology use and education. Change, 31(2), 24-29.
Jackson, L. D. & Grimes, J. (2010). The hybrid course: Facilitating learning through social software. In T. Dumova & R. Fiordo (Eds.), Handbook of research on social interaction technologies and collaboration software: Concepts and trends (pp. 220-232). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
Kim, K-J., & Bonk, C. J. (2006). The future of online teaching and learning in higher education: The survey says. Educause Quarterly, 4, 22-30.
King, K. P. (2002). Identifying success in online teacher education and professional development. Internet and Higher Education, 5, 231-246.
Li, Q. (2007). Student and teacher views about technology: A tale of two cities? Journal of research on Technology in Education, 39(4), 377-397.
Li, C-S., & Irby, B. (2008). An overview of online education: Attractiveness, benefits, challenges, concerns and recommendations. College Student Journal, 42(2), 449-458.
Liaw, S-S., Huang, H-M., & Chen, G-D. (2007). Surveying instructor and learner attitudes toward e-learning. Computers & Education, 49, 1066-1080.
Meloncon, L. (2007). Exploring electronic landscapes: Technical communication, online learning, and instructor preparedness. Technical Communication Quarterly, 16(1), 31-53.
Minocha, S., & Roberts, D. (2008). Social, usability, and pedagogical factors influencing students’ learning experiences with wikis and blogs. Pragmatics & Cognition, 16(2), 272-306.
Olapiriyakul, K., & Scher, J. M. (2006). A guide to establishing hybrid learning courses: Employing information technology to create a new learning experience, and a case study. Internet and Higher Education, 9, 287-301.
Osika, E.R., Johnson, R. Y., & Buteau, R. (2009). Factors influencing faculty use of technology in online instruction: A case study. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, Volume XII, Number I. Retrieved February 10, 2010, from: http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/spring121/osika121.html
Panda, S., & Mishra, S. (2007). E-learning in a mega open university: Faculty attitude, barriers and motivators. Educational Media International, 44(4), 323-338.
Rogers, D. L. (2000). A paradigm shift: Technology integration for higher education in the new millennium. AACE Journal, 1(13), 19-33.
Russell, M., Bebell, D., O’Dwyer, L., & O’Connor. (2003). Examining teacher technology use: Implications for preservice and inservice teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(4), 297-310.
Slevin, J. (2008). E-learning and the transformation of social interaction in higher education. Learning, Media, and Technology, 33 (2), 115-126.
Sutherland, R. (2004). Design for learning: ICT and knowledge in the classroom. Computer & Education, 43, 5-16.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development. (2009). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies, Washington, D.C., 2009.
Retrieved February 10, 2010, from: www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/opepd/ppss/reports.html
Wallace, R. M. (2003). Online learning in higher education: A review of research on interactions among teachers and students. Education, Communication & Information, 3(2), 241-280
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2011 Jennie M. Hwang, Lorraine D. Jackson
Copyrights and publishing rights of all the texts on this journal belong to the respective authors without restrictions.
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License (full legal code).
See also our Open Access Policy.