Flipping university teaching: a flipped classroom experimentation in the Community of Inquiry framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1970-2221/14686Keywords:
flipped classroom, community of inquiry, mixed methods, quasi-experiment, metaphors of educationAbstract
In the context of an Erasmus+ research project on the educational technology, the study deals with the issue of teaching innovation at the university through the experimentation of a flipped classroom, assuming that this can enhance the dimensions of the theoretical framework of the Community of Inquiry (CoI). The results of the CoI Survey – administered to students at the end of the course – are analysed and, in a mixed-method perspective, they are also related to the metaphorical representations provided by students regarding their learning experience. Moreover, in a quasi-experimental design, the CoI results in the flipped course are compared with those obtained in a cycle of traditional lessons. The evidence does not allow to identify an advantage of the flipped model on the cognitive aspects, while it offers partial evidence in favour of traditional lectures about some factors of teacher presence, and in favour of flipped classroom on some aspects of social presence.
References
Akçayır, G., & Akçayır, M. (2018). The flipped classroom: A review of its advantages and challenges. Computers & Education, 126, 334–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.021
Arbaugh, J., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S. R., Garrison, D. R., Ice, P., Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. P. (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instrument: testing a measure of the Community of inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3/4), 133–136.
Ausubel, D. P. (1960). The use of advance organizers in the learning and retention of meaningful verbal material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 51(5), 267–272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0046669
Baldacci, M. (2012). Trattato di pedagogia generale. Carocci.
Ballesteros Velázquez, B., Gil-Jaurena, I., & Morentin Encina, J. (2019). Validación de la versión en castellano del cuestionario ‘Community of Inquiry’. Revista de Educación a Distancia, 19(59). https://doi.org/10.6018/red/59/04
Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom. Reach every student in every class every day. ISTE/ASCD.
Bevilacqua, A. (2018). Flipped Learning in ambito universitario. Pensa MultiMedia.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
Calvani, A., & Trinchero, R. (2019). Dieci falsi miti e dieci regole per insegnare bene. Carocci.
Cecconi, L. (2012). Intento e azione nella progettazione educativa. FrancoAngeli.
Coco, E., Pillera, G.C., & Strongoli, R.C. (2021). Flipped classroom e approccio filosofico alla progettazione didattica universitaria. Un caso di sperimentazione internazionale. Annali del Dipartimento di Scienze della Formazione, 19, 231-246.
Cronbach, L. J. (1963). Course improvements through evaluation. Teachers College Record, 64, 672–683.
De Mauro, T. (2012, November 22). La scuola capovolta. Internazionale, 11-39.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000) (Eds.). Handbook of qualitative research. Sage.
Findlay-Thompson, S., & Mombourquette, P. (2014). Evaluation of a flipped classroom in an undergraduate business course. Business Education & Accreditation, 6(1), 63–71.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071
Giacomantonio, M. (2007). Learning Object. Progettazione dei contenuti didattici per l'e-learning. Carocci.
Grajek, S. (2016). Trend Watch 2016: Which IT trends Is higher education responding to? Research report. ECAR.
Günbatar, M. S. (2021). Flipped Classroom in Higher Education: Evaluation of the Process in the Framework of Community of Inquiry. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 50(2), 215–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395211031660
Hamdan, N., McKnight, P., & McKnight, K. (2013). A review of flipped learning. Flipped Learning Network.
Heitink, M. C., Van der Kleij, F., Veldkamp, B. P., Schildkamp, K., & Kippers, W. B. (2016). A systematic review of prerequisites for implementing assessment for learning in classroom practice. Educational Research Review, 17, 50–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.12.002
Jacot, M. T., Noren, J., & Berge, Z. L. (2014). The Flipped Classroom in Training and Development: Fad or the Future? Performance Improvement, 53(9), 23–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.21438
Karabulut‐Ilgu, A., Jaramillo Cherrez, N., & Jahren, C. T. (2018). A systematic review of research on the flipped learning method in engineering education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(3), 398–411. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12548
Kay, R., MacDonald, T., & Maurice, D. (2019). A comparison of lecture-based, active, and flipped classroom teaching approaches in higher education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 31(3), 449–471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9197-x
Koh, J. H. (2019). Four pedagogical dimensions for understanding flipped classroom practices in higher education: A systematic review. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 19(4), 14–33. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2019.4.002
Kurt, G. (2017). Implementing the flipped classroom in teacher education: Evidence from Turkey. Journal of Educational Technology & Society (20), 211–221.
Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the Classroom: A Gateway to Creating an Inclusive Learning Environment. The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.2307/1183338
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago University Press.
Lee, Y. H., & Kim, K.-J. (2018). Enhancement of student perceptions of learner-centeredness and community of inquiry in flipped classrooms. BMC Medical Education, 18(1), 242. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1347-3
Mazur, E. (1997). Peer Instruction: A User’s Manual. Prentice Hall.
Neumann, J. W. (2013). Developing a new framework for conceptualizing “Student-Centered Learning”. The Educational Forum, 77(2), 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2012.761313
O’Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.002
Perla, L. (2014). La ricerca didattica sugli implicit d'aula. Opzioni metodologiche. Italian Journal of Educational Research(6), 85–95.
Raffaghelli, J. (2017). Does Flipped Classroom work? Critical analysis of empirical evidences on its effectiveness for learning. Form@re - Open Journal Per La Formazione in Rete, 17(3), 116–134.
Scriven, M. (2007). Logica della valutazione e pratica della valutazione. In N. Stame, & N. Stame (a cura di), Classici della valutazione (pp. 188-239). FrancoAngeli.
Stame, N. (2001). Tre approcci principali alla valutazione: distinguere e valutare. In M. Palumbo (a cura di), Il processo di valutazione (pp. 21-46). FrancoAngeli.
Stover, S., & Houston, M. A. (2019). Designing Flipped-Classes to be Taught with Limited Resources: Impact on Students’ Attitudes and Learning. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 19(3), 34–48. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v19i2.23868
Strongoli, R.C. (2017). Metafora e pedagogia. Modelli educativo-didattici in prospettiva ecologica. FrancoAngeli.
Strongoli, R.C. (2021). University education and digital technologies. A critical reflection on the flipped learning model. Formazione Lavoro Persona, 1(33), 216-230.
Talbert, R. (2017). Flipped learning: a guide for higher education faculty. Stylus Publishing.
Wen-Chi, V. W., Chen Hsieh, J. S., & Yang, J. C. (2017). Creating an Online Learning Community in a Flipped Classroom to Enhance EFL Learners’ Oral Proficiency. International Forum of Educational Technology & Society, 20(2), 142–157.
Yilmaz, R. (2020). Enhancing community of inquiry and reflective thinking skills of undergraduates through using learning analytics-based process feedback. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(6), 909–921. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12449
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Emanuele Coco, Giuseppe C. Pillera, Raffaella Carmen Strongoli
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.