Montessori Method and Universal Design for Learning: two methodologies in conjunction for inclusive early childhood education

Authors

  • Nicoletta Rosati University LUMSA of Rome

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1970-2221/12194

Keywords:

Montessori method, universal design, early childhood, learning, environment

Abstract

The main aim of this study is to examine the features of two methods, the Montessori Method and the method based on the principles of Universal Design for Learning, in order to highlight the common characteristics of both and their possible application in inclusive early childhood education. The curriculum represents the formative path for a child’s learning from the perspective of didactical content and educational organization. A curriculum becomes inclusive when all children’s needs are addressed, not only as a group, but also as individual learners. Both the Montessori Method and Universal Design for Learning respect the unique characteristics, learning preferences and true potential of each individual child.

References

Antonietti, A., & Valenti, C. (2017). Life Skills. Le abilità che aiutano ad affrontare il quotidiano. Cinisello Balsamo (MI): San Paolo.

Bjork, E.L., & Bjork, R.A. (2011). Making things hard on yourself, but in a good way: Creating desirable difficulties to enhance learning. In M.A. Gernsbacher, R.W. Pew, L.M. Houghv & J.R. Pomerantz (Eds). Psychology and the real world: Essays illustrating fundamental contributions to society (pp. 56-64). New York: Worth.

CAST (2009). UDL Guidelines-Educator Checklist version 2.0. Wakefield, MA: CAST.

Gutek, G.L. (Ed.). (2004). The Montessori Method: the Origins of an Educational Innovation including an Abridged and Annotated Edition of Maria Montessori’s the Montessori Method. Lanham Maryland: Row-man & Littlefield Publishers.

Hall, T.E., Meyer, A., & Rose, D.H. (2012). Universal Design for Learning in the classroom. Practical Applications. New York: Guilford Press.

Lupi, A. (2018). Il nido con il metodo Montessori. Modelli teorici e buone prassi per educatori e professionisti della prima infanzia. Trento: Erickson.

Mace, R. (1985). Universal Design. Barrier Free Environments for Everyone. Los Angeles: Designers West.

Meo, G. (2008) Curriculum planning for all learners: Applying Universal Design for Learning to a high school reading comprehension program. Preventing School Failure, 52, 2, 21-30.

Montessori, M. (1999). La mente del bambino. Milan: Garzanti. (Original work published 1952)

Montessori, M. (2000). Il Metodo della pedagogia scientifica applicato all’educazione infantile nella Casa dei bambini. Edizione critica. Rome: Opera Nazionale Montessori.

Montessori, M. (2012). Psicogeometria. Roma: Opera Nazionale Montessori. (Original work published 1934)

Montessori, M. (2016). Il segreto dell’infanzia. Milano: Garzanti. (Original work published 1950)

Regni, R., & Fogassi, L. (2019). Maria Montessori e le neuroscienze. Cervello-Mente-Educazione. Rome: Fefè.

Rose, D.H., Gravel, J.W. (2010). Universal Design for Learning. In P. Peterson, E. Baker & B. McGraw (Eds). International Encyclopedia of Education (pp.119-124). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.

Rose, D.H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal Design for Learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Schocchera, A. (1993). Maria Montessori: il pensiero, il metodo. Teramo: Giunti.

Strangman, N., & Dalton, B. (2005). Using technology to support struggling readers: A review of the research. In D. Edyburn, K. Higgins & R. Boone (Eds.). The handbook of special education technology research and practice (pp. 545-569). Whitefish Bay, WI: Knowledge by Design.

Winnicott, D.L. (1974). Gioco e realtà. Rome: Armando. (Original work published 1971)

Downloads

Published

2021-11-02

How to Cite

Rosati, N. (2021). Montessori Method and Universal Design for Learning: two methodologies in conjunction for inclusive early childhood education. Ricerche Di Pedagogia E Didattica. Journal of Theories and Research in Education, 16(2), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1970-2221/12194